MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog

Andrew Gwynne MP kindly interviewed Israel's Social Affairs Minister Isaac Herzog for Labourhome and Labour Friends of Israel



Display: Sort:

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#1)

That was very kindly done..:)

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#2)

Really interesting analysis of the current issues in Israel

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#3)

Very good policies on welfare reform.

It's always good seeing us strengthening our links with Labour parties throughout the world.

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#4)

Refreshing to hear about Israeli social policy from a Labour Minister, not something you come across often. Doesn't sound dissimilar to our own....

Thank you LabourHome for putting this up - it would be great to see more interviews with other sister party members from across the world!

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#5)

Very interesting to hear that we face similar challenges from an ageing population, to helping young people to find their feet in an ever changing society.

The Labour movement's strength comes from our universal values and its great too see that our Labour Party is retaining and strengthening its links with our partners in Israel

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#6)

Thank you to Labourhome and Labour Friends of Israel for this. It’s great to hear from Minister Herzog, who is clearly championing welfare reform on behalf of our sister party in Israel. Let’s hope we see Labor’s position strengthened in the next Knesset.

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#8)

Hear hear.

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#7)

I am very concerned that the Israeli Minister was not questioned about Palestine and that this forum has ignored the plight of the Palestinians, in running this as a front page story.

It is accepted by most informed independent organisations (such as, for example, the UN Special Rapporteur on Palestine) that the treatment of Palestinians, by Israel, is deplorable. In fact, their daily lives are plighted by apartheid. It is the tradition of the left to protect the abused  - somthing that we seem to be failing at, in this instance.

Palestinian civilians are daily subjected to humilation and their very lives are treated as a disposable commodity. Homes are destroyed. Wealth is withdrawn. Freedom of movement impossible. I have written on this site before about the roads within the west bank closed to Palestinans (open to Israeli settlers) and the disparity in the cost of basic services (such as water - Palestinians being charged substantially more than settlers)

Propoganda about Israel is rife, and their lobbying power is strong. However, we should be looking to expose the truth (whether its something we are comfortable with, or not) as it is only with honesty that we can hope to achieve peace.

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#9)

Michelle,

I think you are right on your stance on Palestine, and I happen to know a number of members of Labour Friends of Israel would agree.

But Israeli politics has always been obsessed with security, and I thought it was refreshing to hear something about Israeli politics that was not dominated by that single issue.

I'm a friend of Israel, not of Likud, not of Kadima, not of settlers and not of what I see as crimes against humanity.

And I'm looking forward to joining Labour Friends of Palestine.

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#10)

A very interesting peice and I am not surprised it sounds similar in policy. It is, after all, a Western State in all senses of the word and thus, is likely to adopt western, european style politics.

 Unfortunately we seem to have one of the usual "PALESTINE!" crowd in also, now. I will be more objective than usual about this, though I am sure some will accuse me of just being an evil Israeli supporting Tory without actually reading what I have to say...

I can understand from where you come, and such, but I have to disagree. The problem is not entirely that of Israel's, but of the arabic states and the Palestinians themselves and nothing will be done until all 3 bodies will admit to it [which Israel has always been ready to do, as well as several states such as Jordan, Lebannong and Egypt, all with strenous conditions]

In 1948 perfectly reasonable lines were drawn that would have allowed the co-existence of a Palestinian and Israeli state. However, in 1948 the Arabs and the Palestinians all took up arms against the newly formed state of Israel and the Jewish population over some areas of arable land in the south near the city of Elat up to around Mizpe Ramon where the population, at the time, was largely arabic and not jewish rather than settle this easily at the negotiating table and draw up either co-existence lines, or even a new border to split the area more equally, the states and the Palestinians declared war.

Needless to say, the Israeli's soundly walloped the four Arabic state armies and the Palestinian Militias by themselves.

This sets the ball on any kind of legitimacy of the Palestinian question from now on. Palestine lost and it has to suffer that loss as a continued point of contest.

By the six Day War in 1967 Palestine didn't exist on any kind of map at all. The Gaza Strip was annexed officially by Egypt and the West Bank was officially annexed by the Transjordan Kingdom.

In a bizarre twist of fate, the Israeli's actually put the enitre idea of a Palestinian state back onto the books by  invading these territories in 1967, but not formally annexing them as part of the Six Days War.

Since then it has been stuck between a rock and a hard place in regards to the Palestinian Question.

Sacrifices have been made to the Palestinians because of the method of Palestinian Militants and as ever it's rare for the British Media to actually report this, simply because of the restricted press within those areas, not by the Israeli government which has a free press corps, but by the Palestinian Authority.

Hamas etc build schools, hospitals and other civil buildings which are tall and then promptly use them as fire bases to launch quassam rockets into specifically Israeli civillian areas.

They have workshops specifically within civillian areas so that when the Israeli's legitimately respond with force against an attack, civillian casualties are maximised, thus continuing the cycle and increasing the hatred between the Palestinian masses, who are starved of information, ignorant of their own history and unable to do anything but listen to their own governing powers and thus, direct their hatred towards the "Zionist agressors" even though, more often than not, the Palestinians Infada's are just that. Palestinian in start and execution.

Another oddity which has always prevailed in the Palestinian Question are the Palestinian refugees within the surrounding Arabic States. It has been a full 60 years since the Palestinians arrived in Lebannon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt and they're still living in shanty towns and such and not allowed to actually try to merge with the rest of society of their new "host nation".

If these states truly beleived in the plight of the Palestinians, they'd have accepted their new "brothers" with welcome arms and slowly and steadily integrated them into their own society as immigrants, much as we have done so here?

Instead though, we see a laxadasical "victim" approach that tries to portray Israel as the font of all evil for the plight of the Palestinians, when the states themselves have done no better to alleviate the situation on what is, ultimately, a terrible result of the whole war.

Displacement. They instead perpertrate the myth that the Israelis are somehow all to blame, even though it was the Arabs who instigated the 1948 war that started the whole catastrophic chain of events.

Similarly, Israel is also to blame, during the intial 1948 war there were massacres and atrocities comitted by both sides, this has also continued today with the problem of the Palestinian areas tight and urbanized environs proving a problem to the IDF's heavier equipment, coupled with the problem of the enemy possibly being everywhere and nowhere leads the Israeli's to adopt a ruthlessly pratical approach.

The demolition of buildings that have been used as fire bases before, as well as the homes around it to deny the ground to the enemy literally. This causes the problem of further incitment from the Palestinians due to the obvious problem of demolishing homes with no replacements forthcoming.

In the Israeli mindset it would be like America giving Osama Bin Laden a new condo because they blew up his old one in Afghanistan. It's something that wouldn't even cross your mind to do.

I have another interesting aspect I'd go on about, but instead I shall give you a youtube link to an interesting documentary on some of the "massacres" of the Palestinians by the IDF. If you've never seen it before, you may wish to take a look.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=t_B1H-1opys

Obviously not all footage from Palestine is faked, I'm not suggesting anything of the sort, but it does make you think when you see an ambulance suddenly appear in a flash on camera during such "massacres".

That's all I can think of for now, I'm sure I've brought down a storm from somewhere... >_>

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#15)


I'm not sure what one of 'the usual PALESTINE crowd' is intended to convey but can inform you that (alas) you failed miserably in your attempt to be objective. In fact, I doubt you worried about that - or the facts - before you posted this rant.

Your choice of language is suspect too - do you really think that using terms such as 'walloping state armies' lends credence to your argument?

I hope, and expect, that the vast majority of the readers of this website will abhor the gloryfication of war.

We, no doubt, will disagree on all of the history regarding the area. What is important is the future. That is just as important for Israel, as Palestine. I am saddened that you cannot see this. 

I should respond to your account of the history; but before I do, I want to ensure that everyone is aware that  I firmly believe in a two-state solution.

Nevertheless, it is not true to say that fair lines were drawn in 1948. For a start, what legal mandate did the UN have to give away part of a country? Perhaps, if a simple veto was allowed then that UN decision would have legitimacy. The Arab states boycotted the UN meetings in the hope that the action to give-away part of Palestine would be reconsidered. Instead, the decision was made on a simple majority. I have considered taking a legal argument to the International Court on this issue - not that Israel would listen - and given, that now, the only solution is a two state solution there seems little point.

Even, if one was to accept that the land had to be divided (given the holocaust /world war two; it was clear that something needed to be done - but I do not think that this was the right thing); the land was not fairly divided. The land was disproportionately given to Israel. They had over half the land but at that stage owned only 6% of it. Israel started out with unreasonable demands - demanding 80% - and do not appear to have withdrawn from this position. Instead, they seem to have decided just to take what they want.

Worse, once the UN indicated that they would be dividing land on ethnicity grounds Israel threatened to kill Palestinian civilians if they did not leave the area. Palestinians left, believing the lie that it was a short term measure and their land was seized. This article really is too short to go into lots of detail, but I highly recommend Ilan Pappe's book 'the ethnic cleansing of Palestine'. Ilan Pappe is an Israeli Jewish historian and his book makes much use of Israeli previous secret service documents released from the Israeli Government.

Presently, Israel keeps making incursions into Gaza. Incursions, of course, is a sanitised way of saying Israel keeps invading Gaza. Gaza has a population density greater than Calcutta. I don't agree with any violence, but if you invade a country you should expect a response. That you think that because Palestine lost the six day war they should just suffer the loss, is an awful indictment on your own view of the world.

Imagine a classroom full of children if one was stronger (and had stronger friends) and beat another up, would you simply take the view of the strongest? In fact, if you applied this analogy to any subject area - poverty, health etc you would soon realise that your viewpoint is contrary to a left wing approach.  


I agree it is deplorable that the Arab States do not treat the refugees well - and also believe it is deplorable that Palestinians are specifically excluded from the Geneva Convention (because it was thought the dispute would be resolved shortly) with the net effect that Western States refuse Palestinian Asylum Seekers. However, it is Israel who created the refugees and, sadly, you and Israel seem to be blind to that reality.

Finally, for those interested in a peaceful resolution to the  crisis you may wish to consider joining the facebook group - Labour Friends of Palestine,

Michelle Harris 

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#16)

The link to the previous article I have written on Palestine is at http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/3/2/121413/3926

Kind Regards,

Michelle Harris 

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#11)

Yes I see you enter a country take the country and land by military you then arm that country with Nukes and tell the rest your stuffed, some way of working out a deal.

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#12)

Please don't read that selectively Treborc, it would help if you bothered to read it properly instead of skimming it and posting a comment.

The Palestinians instigated the war and lost, they continue to loose out today because of that consequence, it's really that simple. The standing issue of all Western states is "not to negotiate with terrorists" [Something we decided to abandon with the IRA and Taleban, which I strongly disagree with now and then]

If any of these groups actually acted legitimately as underground resistence instead of little more than fanatical butchers taking pot shots at Israeli civillians from built up civillian areas calling in a legitimate responce specifically engineered for high civillian casualties I'd call for a negotiated settlement, and indeed that is what is happening between Israel and the Fatah-run Palestinian Authority.

Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#14)

Resisting ethnic cleansing isn't 'instigating a war'. 

As for the wars in the sixties, check out the latest list of Palestinian men, women and children who have been murdered by the Israeli's.

Not only were the vast majority not even alive fifty years ago, some of them weren't even alive five years ago.


Re: MP Gwynne interviews Israeli Minister Herzog (#13)

"A very interesting peice and I am not surprised it sounds similar in policy. It is, after all, a Western State in all senses of the word and thus, is likely to adopt western, european style politics." - Angry Voter

Western States aren't based on racist fantasies about 'chosen peoples' and 'promised lands'.

Nor do they have Israel's Nuremberg style race laws, like the one against Jewish/Arab mixed marriages.

By the way, isn't it funny how this wasn't mentioned in the chat about social affairs? I suppose it just never came up.